<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Bracketology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;page_id=27" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com</link>
	<description>24/7 College Basketball And All the Other Top Sports Stories!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:55:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1952&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;mizzou36:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Georgetown a #2 seed?  Is that a joke………&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Find a team with a better resume than Georgetown to put on the 2 line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-1952" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>mizzou36:</em></strong><br />
</a></p>
<p>Georgetown a #2 seed?  Is that a joke………</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Find a team with a better resume than Georgetown to put on the 2 line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mizzou36</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>mizzou36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>Georgetown a #2 seed?  Is that a joke.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Georgetown a #2 seed?  Is that a joke&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Night Bubble Breakdown: Two At Large Bids Remaining? &#171; OnlineSportsFanatic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Night Bubble Breakdown: Two At Large Bids Remaining? &#171; OnlineSportsFanatic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>[...] Daily Bracketology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daily Bracketology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaudius</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaudius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on the 4-13 match between Tenn and San Jose State in Spokane? Would this be a home court disadvantage for Tenn, is there a better option?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on the 4-13 match between Tenn and San Jose State in Spokane? Would this be a home court disadvantage for Tenn, is there a better option?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBS Selection Challenge: Expert Group &#171; OnlineSportsFanatic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>CBS Selection Challenge: Expert Group &#171; OnlineSportsFanatic.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>[...] Daily Bracketology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daily Bracketology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris02M</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris02M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>if its any comfort i have baylor and texas a+m higher in my own bracket,baylor a 4 ,texas a+m a 5 with byu and gtown as 6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if its any comfort i have baylor and texas a+m higher in my own bracket,baylor a 4 ,texas a+m a 5 with byu and gtown as 6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigEastRulez</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>BigEastRulez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>I apologize for the heavy sarcasm.... but jesus christ, it&#039;s incredibly frustrating when your conference isn&#039;t getting the respect it deserves.

Baylor and Texas A&amp;M are for real. With their resumes and RPI, how are they getting stuck with 6-seeds?

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1927&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;BigEastRulez:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 There are several huge problems with these brackets…
First, no team in the central, mountain, or pacific time zones should have a seed above 13. Especially Big XII teams (and don’t buy into that silly “our conference has the #1 RPI talk).
In fact, why don’t we just take out teams like Baylor (RPI-8), Texas A&amp;M (RPI-12), Texas (RPI-27), Okahoma St. (RPI-28), and Mizzouri (RPI-36) and replace them with Big East, ACC, or even A-10 teams.
In fact, lets give automatic bids to ALL Big East teams.  To be fair and balanced, we can seed all the Big XII teams not from Kansas between Rutgers and Depaul.  Plus, do you remember Jimmy V… that guy was great… make sure NC St. gets a good seed too.
Last, don’t let any stubborn facts like RPI, SOS, or overall record convince you to drop a team like Vandy to the far inferior Big XII teams (not from Kansas). Those Big XII teams are CLEARLY inferior to the likes of Vandy, Georgetown, Wisconsin, Tennessee, and Xavier. 
Everyone knows that Big XII teams never win in the tourney (like last year when Big XII teams went a pathetic 11-6).
So to summarize, The Big XII sucks and should get absolutely no respect whatsoever. The Big East is the best and should have 14 teams in.
Seriously, why so little respect for the Big XII?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for the heavy sarcasm&#8230;. but jesus christ, it&#8217;s incredibly frustrating when your conference isn&#8217;t getting the respect it deserves.</p>
<p>Baylor and Texas A&amp;M are for real. With their resumes and RPI, how are they getting stuck with 6-seeds?</p>
<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-1927" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>BigEastRulez:</em></strong><br />
</a><br />
 There are several huge problems with these brackets…<br />
First, no team in the central, mountain, or pacific time zones should have a seed above 13. Especially Big XII teams (and don’t buy into that silly “our conference has the #1 RPI talk).<br />
In fact, why don’t we just take out teams like Baylor (RPI-8), Texas A&amp;M (RPI-12), Texas (RPI-27), Okahoma St. (RPI-28), and Mizzouri (RPI-36) and replace them with Big East, ACC, or even A-10 teams.<br />
In fact, lets give automatic bids to ALL Big East teams.  To be fair and balanced, we can seed all the Big XII teams not from Kansas between Rutgers and Depaul.  Plus, do you remember Jimmy V… that guy was great… make sure NC St. gets a good seed too.<br />
Last, don’t let any stubborn facts like RPI, SOS, or overall record convince you to drop a team like Vandy to the far inferior Big XII teams (not from Kansas). Those Big XII teams are CLEARLY inferior to the likes of Vandy, Georgetown, Wisconsin, Tennessee, and Xavier.<br />
Everyone knows that Big XII teams never win in the tourney (like last year when Big XII teams went a pathetic 11-6).<br />
So to summarize, The Big XII sucks and should get absolutely no respect whatsoever. The Big East is the best and should have 14 teams in.<br />
Seriously, why so little respect for the Big XII?
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigEastRulez</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>BigEastRulez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>
There are several huge problems with these brackets...

First, no team in the central, mountain, or pacific time zones should have a seed above 13. Especially Big XII teams (and don&#039;t buy into that silly &quot;our conference has the #1 RPI talk).

In fact, why don&#039;t we just take out teams like Baylor (RPI-8), Texas A&amp;M (RPI-12), Texas (RPI-27), Okahoma St. (RPI-28), and Mizzouri (RPI-36) and replace them with Big East, ACC, or even A-10 teams.

In fact, lets give automatic bids to ALL Big East teams.  To be fair and balanced, we can seed all the Big XII teams not from Kansas between Rutgers and Depaul.  Plus, do you remember Jimmy V... that guy was great... make sure NC St. gets a good seed too.

Last, don&#039;t let any stubborn facts like RPI, SOS, or overall record convince you to drop a team like Vandy to the far inferior Big XII teams (not from Kansas). Those Big XII teams are CLEARLY inferior to the likes of Vandy, Georgetown, Wisconsin, Tennessee, and Xavier. 

Everyone knows that Big XII teams never win in the tourney (like last year when Big XII teams went a pathetic 11-6).

So to summarize, The Big XII sucks and should get absolutely no respect whatsoever. The Big East is the best and should have 14 teams in.


Seriously, why so little respect for the Big XII?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several huge problems with these brackets&#8230;</p>
<p>First, no team in the central, mountain, or pacific time zones should have a seed above 13. Especially Big XII teams (and don&#8217;t buy into that silly &#8220;our conference has the #1 RPI talk).</p>
<p>In fact, why don&#8217;t we just take out teams like Baylor (RPI-8), Texas A&amp;M (RPI-12), Texas (RPI-27), Okahoma St. (RPI-28), and Mizzouri (RPI-36) and replace them with Big East, ACC, or even A-10 teams.</p>
<p>In fact, lets give automatic bids to ALL Big East teams.  To be fair and balanced, we can seed all the Big XII teams not from Kansas between Rutgers and Depaul.  Plus, do you remember Jimmy V&#8230; that guy was great&#8230; make sure NC St. gets a good seed too.</p>
<p>Last, don&#8217;t let any stubborn facts like RPI, SOS, or overall record convince you to drop a team like Vandy to the far inferior Big XII teams (not from Kansas). Those Big XII teams are CLEARLY inferior to the likes of Vandy, Georgetown, Wisconsin, Tennessee, and Xavier. </p>
<p>Everyone knows that Big XII teams never win in the tourney (like last year when Big XII teams went a pathetic 11-6).</p>
<p>So to summarize, The Big XII sucks and should get absolutely no respect whatsoever. The Big East is the best and should have 14 teams in.</p>
<p>Seriously, why so little respect for the Big XII?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris02M</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1925</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris02M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1925</guid>
		<description>will update be out by 9pm eastern time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will update be out by 9pm eastern time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27&#038;cpage=2#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinesportsfanatic.com/?page_id=27#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1922&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Shaudius:&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;Why do you have Purdue as the 2 seed playing in Providence, you know that the better seeds play closer to home right? They should be the 2 seed in Milwaukee not OSU being the 3 seed in Milwaukee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks for insulting my intelligence. Purdue is a 2 in Providence simply because I did not change my regional sites in the last update. Most of the top seeds remained in the same spots. In the next update, Purdue will probably be in Milwaukee. Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="#comment-1922" rel="nofollow"><br />
<strong><em>Shaudius:</em></strong><br />
</a></p>
<p>Why do you have Purdue as the 2 seed playing in Providence, you know that the better seeds play closer to home right? They should be the 2 seed in Milwaukee not OSU being the 3 seed in Milwaukee.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks for insulting my intelligence. Purdue is a 2 in Providence simply because I did not change my regional sites in the last update. Most of the top seeds remained in the same spots. In the next update, Purdue will probably be in Milwaukee. Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
