When determining whether a team is worthy of an NCAA Tournament berth, it’s important to focus on their body of work from that year, not from two years ago, five years ago or twenty years ago. The best way to do that is to take away the name and looking solely at the resume. Too often teams are misplaced in the Tournament because of their tradition, which plays into a perceived greatness that often isn’t there. Here are five “blind” resumes. Which resume is the best?

(You could go look these up, but I don’t encourage it. That just defeats the purpose.)

TEAM A
Overall Record: 13-6
RPI: 45
SOS: 32
Record vs. Top 25: 2-3
Record vs. 26-50: 0-1
Record vs. 51-100: 3-2
Last 12: 7-5

TEAM B
Overall Record: 13-4
RPI: 31
SOS: 99
Record vs. Top 25: 1-1
Record vs. 26-50: 2-1
Record vs. 51-100: 1-1
Last 12: 10-2

TEAM C
Total Record: 12-7
RPI: 69
SOS: 18
Record vs. Top 25: 1-4
Record vs. 26-50: 1-2
Record vs. 51-100: 3-1
Last 12: 6-6

TEAM D
Total Record: 14-6
RPI: 47
SOS: 63
Record vs. Top 25: 0-1
Record vs. 26-50: 3-2
Record vs. 51-100: 1-2
Last 12: 7-5

TEAM E
Total Record: 12-7
RPI: 74
SOS: 45
Record vs. Top 25: 1-3
Record vs. 26-50: 1-1
Record vs. 51-100: 2-2
Last 12: 7-5

Who’s most deserving?